hckrnws
Graphene is incredible. We've known for a while about graphene's potential but until recently the methods for producing quality graphene were too inefficient/inconsistent. Dr. Chris Sorensen at Kansas State discovered a process to create pristine graphene synthetically (vs from graphite with the scotch tape method mentioned in the article). He is currently bringing this to industry at HydroGraph Clean Power. Exciting times.
Imagine the size of the scotch tape rolls used in a factory of this.
I thought this was going to be a version of the story that appeared this week in New Scientist but it’s a different aspect of electron behavior, in the other article it talks about reducing friction in moving parts https://www.newscientist.com/article/2514425-physicists-can-...
Off topic, but selecting text and right clicking does not work on this site. I'm finding more and more sites of late where this is the case. Wondering if this is intentional or some issue with a popular framework everyone's using.
Here it works.. but, I have this installed https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/absolute-enab...
Also selecting text and then dragging the selection somewhere is broken. I think Quanta's gonna lose its JS privileges on my browser.
Loosely related: This Lex Fridman discussion with a nuclear-fusion engineer, about 1-million-amp 100-million-degree electrical systems... blew my mind: https://lexfridman.com/david-kirtley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_crwFuPht4 AlphaPhoenix - An intuitive approach for understanding electricity
2d materials are so awful to work with but keep yielding these stunningly beautiful results so physicists must persist.
Why should we change how we teach about electricity, when we can change electricity to confirm to how we teach! :)
Well, the water analogy actually holds up quite well if you consider the charge field moving, not the electrons themselves. This guy has a lot of great videos using water channels to explain electricity. It is fascinating how under a high speed scope, you can see the electrical Charge “flow” like water down each branch of a circuit.
Even rubber dams stretched across pipes work exactly like capacitors. Firstly, they block DC: water cannot flow. But back and forth movement is conveyed (AC passes). Less capacitance in series, more in parallel. Two such dams in series do not have more capacitance because to get one to stretch, the other must stretch; they partially cancel. And since there are two, more pressure is needed to get the same stretch. (Same as more voltage needed to cram in the same charge: less capacitance).
Inductance doesn't have an analog. To some extent, the inertia of the fluid cam model some of it, I suppose. Like what is "water hammer" in plumbing? The circuit is too suddenly broken, but the water wants to keep moving. There's gotta be a resulting momentary pressure rise there in the closed-off line, similar to voltage rising in an interrupted inductor. If the valve were some weak piece of crap relative to the mass of the water, the water would break it: like arcing.
Inductance is like a pipe with a flywheel inside it. the water pushes through the impeller/flywheel. the flywheel resists any changes to motion.
Or just a long pipe where the inertia of the water resists change in motion. This is what causes the "water hammer" effect which is a problem for plumbers, but a great thing for all kinds of fun experiments, e.g. creating predictable cavitation [0].
[0]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321225042_A_novel_w...
Those who don't read grandparent comments are condemned to repeat them.
This was the stunning one to me. Just blew my mind literally observing it run up a dead end wire and slosh and rebound like water.
Previously I was used to thinking of dead ends as simply functionally inert. That without a circuit, nothing at all happens in the dead end wire other than the potential for something to happen.
Sure I know something more than nothing actually happens since there is an elevated charge there. But still just the mental model shorthand is that no circuit = no nuthin.
But it's not. It's actually like a pipe with a little bit of air to allow for some compression, and even the dead end has a small flow that travels to the end and builds up against it, then rebounds back and eventially levels out at some homogenious but now higher pressure.
That just boggles me! I love it.
The similarities are pretty strong as is. The method of images https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_images is used in both electrodynamics and aerodynamics because you can model sources and sinks for E fields and fluid flows using the exact same equations. Personally, EM didn't really click until I saw the vector calculus of EM applied to fluids.
ScholarlyArticle: "Supersonic flow and hydraulic jump in an electronic de Laval nozzle" (2025) https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16321 :
> The crossover from subsonic to supersonic flow coincides with a discontinuity in the local electrochemical potential, analogous to the hydraulic jump observed in supercritical classical fluids Gilmore et al. (1950). We identify the electronic shock through combined global transport and local Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), confirming the presence of compressible electron flow
Additional "imaging for electron vortices" from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46919958 re: the kondo effect and hydrodynamics :
> [ nanoscale scanning magnetometer, terahertz pump–probe spectroscopy ]
[dead]
Crafted by Rajat
Source Code